On Jan 10, 2005, at 5:52 PM, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
Jean-Fran�ois Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Apparently whenever a version seems specified to fink..
Part of the situation may confusion about what a "package name" is.
The name of a buildlock pkg (%n) is composed of the name (%n') and
version (%v'-%r') of the pkg for which it is a lock:
%n = buildlock-%n'-%v'-%r'
The lockpkg then has its own version string (which looks like a
datestamp (because it is)). So even though "buildlock-distcc-2.18.3-1"
looks like a full pkg (%f) identifier, it's really just the name (%n).
That's why I wrote "seems" specified...
JF
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
