I was just wondering... why is the package description warning length
different for -v validate than it is without -v? It doesn't seem like -v
is meant to be "more restrictive", but..? On a related note, I let a
package on through because it had a fine length under validate, but it was
complained about with -v validate. Is that ok?
Daniel
--
"The most addictive drug in the world is music."
- The Lost Boyz
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
