I went ahead and switched libnids to libnet1.0 - and packaged dsniff, which was not in fink yet. I dont think a lot of folks have been using libnids especially since dsniff wasn't in fink, and the libnids was installing directly into /sw which is very bad. So i fixed that as well.

Anyway, try the the new dsniff fink pacakge, if its fine i'll move all 3 packages to stable tree.

thanks

-Ben

On Apr 12, 2004, at 5:49 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote:

howdy y'all!

First, i'd like to thank whomever has been keeping the one package I maintain updated as we've moved through 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3.

Since libnet was split into 1.0 and 1.1 versions, libnids is no longer what i want it to be (I use it for dsniff which requires libnet 1.0, not 1.1), since libnids is set to depend on 1.1.

I would like to ask what the correct way to "fix" this is. Personally, i think it should be switched to depend on libnet1.0, but some people might not like that so what is the correct way to provide two package versions? "libnids-libnet1.0-1.18-2.info"?

Thanks a bunch,
JP


--
"NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited, Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you."



------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to