Tony Arnold wrote:
Oops! bad example!, I got people jumpy! lmao. In my previous endeavors to build this stuff on my own gcc-3.4.3 was just on of them, to see if I could do it. But trust me, I am still using the plain old Dev Tools December 2002 with the August whatever update to get gcc3.3. Put your minds at ease! :)Hi Mike,
On 22/02/2005, at 9:25 AM, Michael wrote:
when I built gcc-3.4.3 on my own, I used a line --enable-threads=posix, can everyone using fink in OS X use this threading? Wouldn't that get rid of the annoying gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads' ?
You've just stepped beyond the boundaries of known space :)
AFAIK, fink isn't super happy about switching out the Apple-installed compiler - and I'm not entirely sure that it would get rid of the -pthreads messages - they still occur under gcc-4...
My recommendation would be to not change out the compiler if you want other people to use your work. A lot of people would be very uncomfortable about doing that.
-t
That was an example of one of the packages I built, think I did something wrong anyways, never worked right, but there were others, and I noticed that if I added --enable-threads=posix, I didn't get the gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads'
Where as if I did the same package without that line I did. Being new to this, I am asking whether adding that line to the ConfigureParams would break a package for other people
Sorry for the mix up, Mike S
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
