Jean-François Mertens wrote: []
Sounds perfect _ but are you sure you want 2.1.4 ?
I was just treading carefully here. It is perhaps true that 2.1.7 belongs rather to the 2.1.3 group than to 2.1.9, apart from the artificial incompatibility in the freetype.h header. If we confirm this with more certainty, then it would be easy to push the 2.1.4 package to 2.1.7, independently of the creation of the freetype219 package. I haven't had enough time to test this.
BTW, googling on freetype, I saw that they are now applying for asylum on savannah, because their own server with their cvs repository, mailing lists and ftp server, got nuked at the end of last year. They didn't use the infrastructure of sourceforge except for the distribution of the release tarballs. Gives you something to think about... It also delays the release of version 2.1.10 which might be a good thing, giving us some time to stabilize <assorted evil smileys>.
-- Martin
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
