-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
David R. Morrison wrote:
| Yes, probably we should say that patches for open source projects | inherit the license.
I'm kind of late into the fray here (had a short vacation), but would suggest that we notify submitters that we prefer .info and .patch files to be placed in the public domain, but that explicit licenses can be added to comments in the .info file, or the patch file, if required.
The GPL is a dangerous default license, in my opinion, the default should be the easiest to copy while allowing people the option to make their files more restrictive.
Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBQk1UA7iDAg3OZTLPAQIEbwQAp8uKLxZHNu/2enMlwhvtcGISWOfTTvdv M7R1T4QK6vgXne26Z0ixqweCGdgZYfn7BqEjzHkVRjT3PFkpzD5KDqPocVY/AoY/ F8eUkf9rc4pxSmZO0bgnYKm+oZFH7nW58ufAx5W7ZzXvGBl6ybLoRceWuKJsnIh4 ALlpZsww1cI= =pw2v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/Info/Sentarus/hamr30 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
