-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
because fink policy states that shlibs should use the major version of lib in the pkgname, and this pkg was way out of date so i switched it. The only thing that depends on it is nessus, so i told the nessus maintainer about it and he switched the depend, but he needed to force the nessus lib version for it to work, which he just did. All will be well now.
- ---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 8-May-05, at 10:46 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
TheSin wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yup that is the fix, you could use %v-%r though.
To me, the section in the unstable libdnet
SplitOff: << Package: %N1-shlibs Conflicts: %N-shlibs Replaces: %N (<< 1.5-2), %N-shlibs
looks very much in contradiction with Fink shlibs policy. Why is this called %N1-shlibs when it provides the library with the same install_name as the previous %N-shlibs?
Either the library is compatible with the older one, as its install_name and the higher compatibility number indicate, then the package name should be the same, or it is incompatible, then it should get a different install_name and no Conflicts/Replaces need to be there.
What is the reason for this weird situation? Shouldn't the reason at least be mentioned in the info file?
-- Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCf1f96wPs8J05MxMRAoiEAJ9tfD5oZYwPsqicMMbZnP1WNFhfhwCgypVJ yIfJmDUOrMLMNYYJDbx9BgA= =ZAsG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
