On 2005-08-06, Clemence Magnien wrote: > So, what is your advice? Should I try to do it or not? > I think the first point is not that important, since there are > probably tons of other new functionalities that work very well, > but I'm more concerned with the second. > > If you do think I should try, I have another question: the version > I use is patched so that it does header caching for IMAP mailbox. > What should I do about this? Integrate the patch in the package, > or not integrate it, or make two versions, one with and one without > the patch? (with ssl and non-ssl versions of each...). I have such a version of mutt in my experimental. It might be a good starting point. :-) I also emailed the mutt maintainer and didn't get any response.
crh
pgpmlfeG0podP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
