On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:20:21AM -0500, Corey Halpin wrote: > On 2005-08-06, Clemence Magnien wrote: > > So, what is your advice? Should I try to do it or not? > > I think the first point is not that important, since there are > > probably tons of other new functionalities that work very well, > > but I'm more concerned with the second. > > > > If you do think I should try, I have another question: the version > > I use is patched so that it does header caching for IMAP mailbox. > > What should I do about this? Integrate the patch in the package, > > or not integrate it, or make two versions, one with and one without > > the patch? (with ssl and non-ssl versions of each...). > > I have such a version of mutt in my experimental. It might be a good > starting point. :-) > I also emailed the mutt maintainer and didn't get any response.
Hi, when you say you have such a version of mutt, do you refer to the patched version? Anyway, if I understand correctly that means you have a working mutt.info file for one version or the other. Do you think one of us should try and propose it as an official package description? Or should we (I?) try and make all the four versions I mentioned above before that? Or should we wait for an answer from the maintainer? I really don't know what is the policy in this kind of situation. Cheers, Clemence -- Ce qui se concoit bien s'exprime clairement. - http://www.crea.polytechnique.fr/personnels/fiches/magnien.htm 01 55 55 86 27 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
