On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:57:10 -0500 Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will add the dep for good measure but I remain unconvinced. > > It didn't work, and then you manually added something and now it > works? What more proof could you possibly want that you need to list > this something as one of your dependencies? I guess some sutleties where lost in translation: I am fully aware that Alex advise was appropriate and information regarding gtk+2 are correct. sorry if it wasn't clear I am grateful for the help provided. here are some reasons for me to doubt this, as a strict requirement for my package: - not listed in dependencies on mother website (where upstream package is fetched from) - no mention whatsoever in the install file or any other doc that comes with the source - missing pango-dev yields non verbose check 'GTK+2 >= 2.4.0 - no' when it is obviously wrong - the output of pkg-config that still bothers me in fact looking deeper I know now that it is a dependency of pango and not pango-dev itself that is the issue so while adding it to the dep strings may do the trick it is hardly satisfying... I might as well list all packages under the fink tree just in case an unlisted dependency lies under a rock. Best Regards, Rogue ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
