Sorry to keep this thread going on the list, but I started looking
into compiling the new version of autogen and pretty quickly ran into
this problem with runetype.h:

 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../autoopts -I/sw/include -g
-O2 -MT libopts.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libopts.Tpo -c libopts.c 
-fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/libopts.o
 In file included from /usr/include/ctype.h:69,
                  from ../compat/compat.h:85,
                    from libopts.c:2:
/usr/include/runetype.h:71: error: two or more data types in
declaration specifiers
/usr/include/runetype.h:71: error: two or more data types in
declaration specifiers

At line 85, compat.h includes ctype.h.

I'm not familiar with how to avoid this error .. any hints?

Compiling on 10.4 using
% gcc --version
powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.0 (GCC) 4.0.0 20041026 (Apple Computer,
Inc. build 4061)

Thanks,
-dave

On 4/9/06, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Bacher wrote:
> > On 4/9/06, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Does anyone know what this package is used for and whether moving its
> >> options.h from /sw/include/ to /sw/share/autogen/ would be noticed by
> >> anyone at all?
> >
> > As the listed maintainer, I'm happy to describe what this package is
> > used for.
>
> Sorry for not asking you first. I am glad to hear that you are still
> around :-)
>
> >It's basically a Scheme-programmable templating system for
> > generating text files. I used to use for website header and footer
> > generation and for maintaining multiple copies of dotfiles that
> > differed slightly across hosts on different unix variants.
> >
> > At the time it was very useful, but since I rarely use the package
> > myself these days, I've let it languish and haven't tried to keep it
> > up to date.
> >
> > Feel free to either remove it from recent (10.4) dists or to adjust
> > the poor header location in the build phase. Please choose whichever
> > option you feel most comfortable with.
> >
> > If I hear any demand for this package, I'm happy to try to build and
> > submit a more recent version -- and I'll find a solution for the
> > problem discussed above.
>
> I see now that I have it installed on one of my machines, too; I don't
> remember why. Others have it installed, or the problem wouldn't have
> come up. Is that enough motivation for upgrading the package?
>
> --
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>


--
David Bacher  _..  ._  ..._  .
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to