> I successfully built openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104 on my > PowerBook, which is currently set up for 10.4-transitional. So far > everything seems to run as it did on prior versions. > > However, I was looking around at some of the object files to see if I > would have to rebuild the package on my 10.4 (real) setup. The files > that I looked at all look like the following: > > $ otool -L /sw/lib/openoffice.org-firefox/program/uno.bin > /sw/lib/openoffice.org-firefox/program/uno.bin: > @executable_path/libuno_sal.dylib.3 (compatibility version > 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > @executable_path/libuno_salhelpergcc3.dylib.3 (compatibility > version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > @executable_path/libuno_cppu.dylib.3 (compatibility version > 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > @executable_path/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.dylib.3 > (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.6.dylib (compatibility version 6.2.0, > current version 6.2.0) > @executable_path/libstlport_gcc.dylib (compatibility version > 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, > current version 88.1.5) > > $ otool -L /sw/lib/openoffice.org-firefox/program/libreg.dylib.3 > /sw/lib/openoffice.org-firefox/program/libreg.dylib.3: > @executable_path/libreg.dylib.3 (compatibility version > 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > @executable_path/libuno_sal.dylib.3 (compatibility version > 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > @executable_path/libuno_salhelpergcc3.dylib.3 (compatibility > version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > @executable_path/libstore.dylib.3 (compatibility version > 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, > current version 88.1.5) > @executable_path/libstlport_gcc.dylib (compatibility version > 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > > (i.e. @executable_path didn't get replaced by '/sw/lib/openoffice.org- > firefox/program/ when the install_name for any of the libraries was > set). > > I don't know if this matters for libraries that are only used > internally (I'm sending -devel this message too to get information > there), but I thought I should mention it. > > Also, is there a reason that the libraries are named "libreg dylib. > 3" (for example) rather than "libreg.3.dylib"? > You found a bug. It does not break anything immediately, but incorrect and might cause problems in future. I report it to OOo.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
