Doing a selfupdate automatically after reconfiguring to use unstable would make sense, since users have to do that anyway if they're using rsync updating. (and going the other way it would still be a good idea)
On 12/5/06, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's great! > > I wonder whether, when a user has changed the Trees entry, fink > should automatically do a selfupdate at the end of 'fink configure'? > > -- Dave > > On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: > > > As part of 'fink configure', HEAD now offers to enable/disable the > > "unstable" entries in /sw/etc/fink.conf:Trees. Default is to leave > > current settings unchanged. When enabling, the "unstable" analog of > > each presently-enabled "stable" tree is appended to the Trees field. > > Please test, fix wording of the prompt, complain about ordering of the > > newly-added entries or other unlikable behavior, etc etc. > > > > dan > > > > -- > > Daniel Macks > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks > > > > -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter (still) Got job? http://akhmac.blogdns.net/~hansen/akh_cv/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
