On 13 Jan 2007, at 14:59, Jack Howarth wrote:

> Dave,
>    The analysis of gcc42 is incorrect. There are no fat binaries
> created but rather an explicit 64-bit subdirectory.
A small correction: at least I am getting  3 fat libraries /sw/lib/ 
gcc4.2/lib/libgcc_s.*.dylib

Jean-Francois

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to