On 1/29/07, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible (since we are on 2-processor machines
> here) that some thread of "make install" hasn't quite finished when
> dpkg-deb is already starting to wrap up?

As another datapoint, I have seen the "file changed as we read it"
error on a single-processor G4 laptop.

In my experience, "make -j" generally waits for all of its
subprocesses to exit before returning (even when failing on an error).
The only case where that might not catch everything is if a make
target adds an ampersand to put the command in the background - which
is probably a Bad Idea(tm) anyway.

I haven't run into this much, but if I had time to debug tar, I'd try
adding a debug printf that says *what* actually changed (since I
suspect it's just metadata, like stat's atime or mtime).

-- 
- Charles Lepple

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to