-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Max Horn wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering: Is there any particular reason to *not* move gtk+2 > v2.6 to the stable tree (which currently still has 2.4.9) ? All its > deps are in stable, according to a check done with > fink --trees=stable,virtual rebuild gtk+ > (after copying the 2.6 .info file to stable).
Hm, I think that would be a good idea... Especially since if I ever get to finishing testing the pangocairo branch, gtk+-related packages are going to really be shaken up in unstable soon... - -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development http://www.racoonfink.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF6CAKUu+jZtP2Zf4RArmzAKCYeemLRqGPNa2Z9O6gzOrcP2tcHQCeMD5f u6cTFMiGfWtMv5z34RJK7ww= =ZG1w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
