Hi Dan, On Jun 5, 2007, at 8:59 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 07:19:47PM -0500, Remi Mommsen wrote: >> >> Thanks for implementing this feature. I gave it a try and it seems to >> mostly work. There is an issue with the validation when running with >> 'fink -m' when it comes to validating the deb directories: >> >> Validating .deb dir /sw/src/fink.build/root-root5- >> shlibs-5.14.00e-3... >> Error: Shlibs field specifies /sw/lib/root/libEGPythia6.5.dylib, but >> it does not exist! >> Error: Shlibs field specifies /sw/lib/root/libG4root.5.dylib, but it >> does not exist! >> Error: Shlibs field specifies /sw/lib/root/libHbook.5.dylib, but it >> does not exist! >> Removing runtime build-lock... >> Removing build-lock package... >> >> These shlibs do indeed not exists and are protected by the >> conditional. Here's a snippet of the shlibs field: >> (%type_pkg[-cernlib]) %p/lib/root/libEGPythia6.5.dylib 5.0.0 %n >> (>=5.02.00-1) >> (%type_pkg[-geant4]) %p/lib/root/libG4root.5.dylib 5.0.0 %n >> (>=5.14.00-1) >> (%type_pkg[-qt]) %p/lib/root/libGQt.5.dylib 5.0.0 %n >> (>=5.15.04-2) >> %p/lib/root/libGX11.5.dylib 5.0.0 %n (>=5.02.00-1) >> %p/lib/root/libGX11TTF.5.dylib 5.0.0 %n (>=5.02.00-1) >> (%type_pkg[-cernlib]) %p/lib/root/libHbook.5.dylib 5.0.0 %n >> (>=5.02.00-1) >> %p/lib/root/libHist.5.dylib 5.0.0 %n (>=5.02.00-1) >> >> Interesting to note is that the validation does not complain about >> the libraries which are only built by the '-qt' variant (and which >> are missing, too). I guess, that is connected to the order of the >> type field: >> Type: -cernlib (boolean), -geant4 (boolean), -qt (boolean) >> >> i.e. it looks like that only the last conditional is taken into >> account. >> >> I copied the current version of the root5-devel info and patch >> file to: >> http://www-clued0.fnal.gov/~mommsen/fink/ > > That .info doesn't match the validator results you cited. Could you > please show us a .info (and also the .deb itself) and the validator > results for it? > > Shlibs data is stored in the .deb and the .deb validator reads it from > there, not from the .info, so need to figure out whether the bug is in > the .info parser (during compiling the .deb) or in the validator, or > in some weird typo or expectation of how something "should" work. Sorry for the confusion. You are correct, I messed it up using root5 instead of root5-devel. The former does not have the conditional shlib field entries, yet. Remi -- No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ********************************************************************* Remigius K. Mommsen e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Manchester URL: http://cern.ch/mommsen Fermilab, MS 357 voice: ++1 (630) 840-8321 P.O. Box 500 fax: ++1 (630) 840-2649 Batavia, Il 60510, US home: ++1 (630) 236-0932 ********************************************************************* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
