On 21/07/07, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that ruby16 join the list of obsolete versions of language > packages that we won't support in 10.5. (The others already on this > list are perl581, perl581, python23, and java13.) We would retain > ruby 18. > > Does anybody forsee any problems with this? >
I am not sure if anybody still uses the package. It's not been updated for a long time, and it probably won't. However, if it happens to work on 10.5 some people might want it. I suspect there are still some 1.6 extensions/projects that were not ported to 1.8. I personally do not use 1.6 either. Thanks Michal ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
