On 06 Nov 2007, at 16:23, Jack Howarth wrote: > JF, > I am not sure I follow you. The first instance is indeed the > library > install name. However the second instance for the framework dylib is > an entirely different library which happens to have the same basename.
Only said this has always been the case... JF > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:02:51PM +0100, Jean-Fran\uffffois > Mertens wrote: >> >> On 06 Nov 2007, at 15:46, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >>> Peter, >>> I would dispute you on the linker issue. If you look at the output >>> from 'otool -L' for /usr/lib/X11R6/libGL.dylib under Tiger, you will >>> see that it has the linkages to both itself... >>> >>> /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.2.0, >>> current version 1.2.0) >>> >>> and the framework libGL.dylib... >>> >>> /System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/ >>> Libraries/libGL.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version >>> 1.0.0) >>> >>> are present. >> >> This has always been the case; for all dylibs, otool -L first >> lists the >> dylib itself, with its install_name. >> >> (and never dispute pogma on ld issues ... _ you'd be on the wrong >> side :) >> >> JF Mertens ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
