sounds reasonable.
most packages should just work with 4.2
but complicated ones will need patches

I think support for 4.2 in fink should be enabled as early as
possible, so that "beta testers of 4.2" could report issues

On 12/11/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>    Has anyone started to consider how we should handle
> the release of the gcc 4.2 compilers for Xcode 3.0 once
> they are out of the Preview stage? I am wondering if we
> might modify fink to detect the installation of the
> Apple gcc 4.2 compilers and default over to them unless
> the package used a flag in the info file to prevent this
> behavior. How does that sound?
>             Jack
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
>


-- 
Alexey Zakhlestin
http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

Reply via email to