Peter O'Gorman wrote: [] > > I imagine that it will be closed as invalid. With -a, you are > essentially asking for all processes with a controlling terminal, with > -p you ask for all processes which match the given process id. ps will > return both all the processes with a controlling terminal and all > processes matching the pid.
Argh; I really should know better by now than to read man pages on a Leopard machine on which I haven't mucked out personally the 4500 or so man pages that remain from Tiger when doing an upgrade install. :-( I guess the line proposed by Evan - using "ps xww -p pid" is correct for Tiger and Leopard anyway. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
