I wouldn't imagine so. One reason we use dynamic libraries is that updates, as long as they're compatible with the prior version, automatically get used--no rebuild needed. If they're not compatible, then that's another matter.
Juan M. Courcoul wrote: > After a MAJOR version change like this, is there any benefit in recompiling > all source (i.e., pick up new libraries & optimizations, etc.), performance > or security-wise? > > On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, at 01:44PM, "Randal L. Schwartz" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>>> >> Alexander> If you're on 0.8.1, then do a final "fink selfupdate" with rsync >> or >> Alexander> cvs updating under OS 10.4 to insure you're on fink-0.27.10, >> Alexander> install OS 10.5, and then do "fink reinstall fink ; fink >> Alexander> selfupdate". After that you should be good to update non-base >> Alexander> packages, as needed. -- >> >> locohost.local:~ % fink --version >> Package manager version: 0.27.10 >> Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync i386 >> >> OK, so I should be fine. I selfupdate daily. :) >> > > > -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink User Liaison/Documenter akh AT finkproject DOT org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
