Am 27.04.2008 um 13:19 schrieb Martin Costabel: > Max Horn wrote: >> Here is the next one I got: >> Reading buildlock packages... >> All buildlocks accounted for. >> While trying to install: >> glibmm2.4-dev-2.14.2-2 >> glibmm2.4-shlibs-2.14.2-2 >> The following inconsistencies found: >> Unsatisfied dependency in glibmm2.4: glibmm2.4-dev (= >> 2.12.10-1003) > > It would be interesting to know how you got there. Not by using > update-all, I suppose? Was glibmm2.4-dev-2.14.2-2 pulled in as a > dependency of something else?
Not an update-all, right, I wanted to update certain packages only. But I can reduce the issue to the case you mentioned: > > Does "fink update glibmm2.4" work, or does it block itself? It blocks itself. Cheers, Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
