On Jul 17, 2008, at 9:05 PM, David Reiser wrote: > OK. From the horse's mouth, so to speak. Swig should be able to be > built and installed without any languages, and even if it finds and > tests languages, the core swig remains the same. > > There was one dissenting comment from an ocaml user, but I it wasn't > an "it doesn't work" complaint. > > I think we can go ahead and pull most of the dependencies on swig. > > I should probably test the guile capabilities to be sure my last > problem was just an environment problem and not swig.
Is anybody able to test on a clean system if building without dependencies will affect packages that depend on swig? If it doesn't dependencies could be stripped all together. Pepe ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
