On 13 Sep 2008, at 18:34, Benjamin Reed wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Alexander Hansen wrote: >> I didn't realize it, but fink supports a dependency of the form >> ( =<version> ) without specifying a revision. >> >> If all octave-using packages agree to use Depends: octave ( =<current >> version> ) | octave-atlas ( =<current version> ) [or an equivalent] >> rather than ( >=<current version>-1), then that will satisfy the >> prior >> breakage issue in a simpler packaging setup. > > Will it? I thought that if you don't give a revision, it treats it > as 0 > internally.
had something like that in mind too; on the other hand, (>= %v-1) together with (<= %v-9999) should work, and be equivalent, no ? JF ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
