On Oct 1, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:

> moving to fink-devel...
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2008, at 3:31 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
>> The user-friendly solution would be to have two packages, one for
>> 10.4 that depends on -pm586, and one for 10.5 that depends on -
>> pm588. In this way, users don't need to install Fink perl packages,
>> the system perl will do.
>
> So, I made two packages, tcoffee-10.4 and tcoffee-10.5, it builds fine
> on 10.5 (don't have 10.4). Should I also update the Package field in
> the info file to tcoffee-10.x, the validator didn't complain about it?
>
> thanks,
>
> - Koen.
>

Nope.  Leave the name as tcoffee, and make sure that tcoffee-10.4 has  
Distribution: 10.4 and tcoffee-10.5 has Distribution: 10.5 .  fink  
will then do the right thing and pick the appropriate version for the  
OS.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

Reply via email to