On 28/06/2009, at 19:22, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > David Fang wrote: >> Thanks for the feedback everyone. >> There was also some discussion of creating a more minimalist variant >> without all of the extension language bindings. >> >> So how does the following sound? >> >> graphviz-base (no x11, no language plug-ins, just dot and friends) > > graphviz-base sounds like it's the core package that has other sub > packages available that add further features. In fact, that's what a > lot of the kde packages do: > <http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php?name=base> Maybe > graphviz-basic or graphviz-minimal?
On the other hand, I believe that's the way tetex is packaged: $ fink list tetex tetex 3.0-1006 Complete distribution of the TeX typesetting system tetex-base 3.0-1006 Base programs for a teTeX installation tetex-nox 3.0-1006 Complete distribution of the TeX typesetting system tetex-nox-base 3.0-1006 Base programs for a teTeX installation tetex-texmf 3.0-2 Main texmf tree for a teTeX installation with tetex conflicting with/replacing tetex-base and tetex-nox conflicting with/replacing tetex-nox-base. I'm not sure that's an actual policy for this or if one is really necessary. For what it's worth, my personal choice is David's original suggestion. >> graphviz-nox (no x11, but with 'all' language plug-ins) >> graphviz (with x11, gtk+pangocairo, all the fixins Cheers, -- monipol http://finkers.wordpress.com Submitting a Fink bug report? Read this: http://www.finkproject.org/doc/netiquette/index.php http://finkers.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/bug-reports/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
