Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
>   
>> <snip>
>>   
>>     
>
>   
>> pine was superceded by alpine upstream. Maybe time to replace pine and
>> pine-ssl (both presently unmaintaind) with pointers to alpine (which
>> is maintained)? The *pine builds are scary-nonstandard...no reason to
>> keep obsolete stuff that is difficult to understand and build.
>>
>> dan
>>
>>   
>>     
> Seems reasonable to me.
>
>   
Since we've got pine | pine-ssl in stable, I'll ask htodd if there's any
reason not to move alpine over.

-- 
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to