Alexander Hansen wrote: > Daniel Macks wrote: > >> <snip> >> >> > > >> pine was superceded by alpine upstream. Maybe time to replace pine and >> pine-ssl (both presently unmaintaind) with pointers to alpine (which >> is maintained)? The *pine builds are scary-nonstandard...no reason to >> keep obsolete stuff that is difficult to understand and build. >> >> dan >> >> >> > Seems reasonable to me. > > Since we've got pine | pine-ssl in stable, I'll ask htodd if there's any reason not to move alpine over.
-- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel