Daniel Macks wrote: > Remind me why: > >>> BuildConflicts: bzip2-dev > > is a good idea?
Not really: costabel% fink selfupdate [...] Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Scanning package description files.......... Information about 9314 packages read in 2 seconds. The following package will be installed or updated: unzip The following package might be temporarily removed: bzip2-dev Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y The following packages must be temporarily removed, but there are no .debs to restore them from: bzip2-dev Exiting with failure. <rant> I will *not* rebuild one superfluous package - bzip2 - in order to be able to build another superfluous package - unzip - just because they are tagged essential. I have always considered making unzip an essential package a mistake. MacOSX *always* came with unzip, so even if there may have been a reason to create a Fink unzip package, there never was a reason to make it essential. </rant> -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
