On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:40:35PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > Jack Howarth wrote: > > JF, > > Okay. Untested gcc45-x86_64.info with a gcc45-compiler > > splitoff. Still needs the libffi update-alternatives. > > To me, this one looks OK (untested, of course), contrary to the > description in one of dmacks' latest messages (the one with *1, *2 etc), > which even after reading it 3 times still looks really backwards.
Crapola yeah, cut'n'pasted the wrong line! "compiler in lib/gcc4.x *1" is what should have gone in gcc4x-compiler. Glad the convoluted explanation was clear enough that at least the other screwup was noticed:( dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
