On 03 May 2010, at 20:10, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Peter reminded me on IRC that the original motivation behind having a > 'gcc' package was to provide a "current FSF compiler" at runtime for > packages that needed an FSF compiler tool but didn't care what version > it was. That's different than trying to automatically update > anything.
Sure. And there was no suggestion of any sort to "automatically update things", I only wrote that the scheme might help users to automatically update their gcc. As I wrote, the normal situation remains : Bdep: gcc4N-compiler Dep: gcc4N-shlibs (This way deps and bdeps never involve conflicts) JF ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
