On 18 May, 2010, at 9:01 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Thank you, Mr. Macks for providing a happily detailed answer to my
question. Naturally, now that i know more i have some more [and hopefully more
focused] questions.
> Using -dead_strip on a binary FOO prunes libs
> that are not actually used to resolve symbols called from FOO.
I ended up taking that out because A) i got the impression that this is
a test procedure and shouldn't be part of the released product and B) it gave
me a compiler error under Tiger.
Q1: Does fink have an official policy regarding how long we continue to
support 10.4?
> That cuts down the Depends (runtime requirements) but
> still means you need the full BuildDepends (in order to have the
> published flags work at compile-time).
That sounds appealing.
Q2: But until i re-implement the stripping, it seems i still have to Depend
upon a -shlib for every BuildDepend, right?
Sent from my MacBookPro
I have three pets: two large main cats, and a small emergency backup one.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
