On Jul 6, 2010, at 08:38, Alexander Hansen wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/5/10 5:53 PM, Scott Hannahs wrote: >> I did the original package development for a package and now have >> heard that the installation fails on 10.6. I haven't looked at >> package development in awhile and there are a lot of improvements >> so I was going to update the package. >> >> -Scott >> >> > > Different .info files for each OS version with appropriate Type: perl > for each, perhaps?
I can do that as well, and just hard code the version of perl used. But somewhere (and I can't find it this morning) I thought that the policy was to try to have as many packages built that will handle all 10.4 though 10.6. Thus I was trying to find the accepted way of using the perl version and the package version. But that tells me that my package is duplicately defined. And validate gives % fink validate rmagic.info Validating package file rmagic.info... Error: Duplicate declaration of package "rmagic". (rmagic.info) Error: Duplicate declaration of package "rmagic". (rmagic.info) Error: Duplicate declaration of package "rmagic". (rmagic.info) Error: Duplicate declaration of package "rmagic". (rmagic.info) this is under OS 10.5. I have the distribution defined 3 times for 10.5 for different versions of perl. I have 4 versions of perl on my system (3 in fink and one from the OS). I can get rid of this by defining my package to be rmagic-pmNN but is that necessary? -Scott ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
