-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/14/10 7:29 PM, David Lowe wrote: > Here's another jam i've gotten myself into. I'm gradually building a > set of dependencies manually in /usr/local so i can attempt to make a > clickable app of freeciv. I *think* i can get away with this by renaming > /usr/local every time i use fink. My question is, do i similarly need to > rename /sw when i do the configure/make/install ritual? The reason i ask is > that my build of atk is failing because it is seeing fink's 32 bit version of > glib-2.0.pc rather the 64 bit version that i built but it apparently got left > in the build directory rather than getting moved to PKG_CONFIG_PATH. That > part's got nothing to do with fink, so just ignore that unless somebody wants > to contact me privately. However, should my manual build really be pulling > in files from /sw/lib/pkgconfig/ ? > > Sent from my MacBookPro >
You might at least want not to run init.sh in your session where you build. The pkgconfig executable is in the PATH. (or maybe uninstall pkgconfig) - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkw+SS8ACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+vTACfWvMfHQxxVuhU9fHpxpIlwOSU IhIAoJahEnmkOxDKbK32S9SQHYAYF6xb =+dSc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
