On 06 Aug 2010, at 17:32, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > As long a cloog's own install_name doesn't change, I see in > principle no problem in > creating a new ppl pkg for the new version (since there the install > name does change), > and to upgrade (independently, ie, whenever you want) cloog and one > or more gccxy pkgs > to use the new ppl (and/or) the updated cloog. > I.e., cloog and gccxy using diferent ppl's should not be a problem > per se > (as long as you can prevent cloog's flags for ppl to come before > gcc's own flags in the > build of gcc; but that's at worst a flag-ordering problem).
More explicity, for cloog it can be a plain version update, and things that linked to the old version should continue linking well with the new, w/o rebuilding. JF ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
