Daniel E. Macks <[email protected]> said: > According to the Packaging Manual on Distribution support: > > perl 5.8.6: 10.3, 10.4, 10.5 > > which matches what I remember from previous discussions of deprecating > old langversions. We don't support 10.3 in this tree and 10.4's > system-perl is 5.8.6, but our perl586 package in current unstable is: > > Distribution: 10.5, 10.6 > > And "some fraction" of our -pm586 module packages are also available > on 10.6. But not all. Including not some that are dependencies of ones > that are. Should we nuke 5.8.6 from 10.6 so we don't have to keep > supporting such old stuff, and then fix the Distribution tags in > -pm586, or should we go the other way and actually support it and fix > the dep tree holes?
perl5.8.6 and the seven *586 variants have now been removed from 10.6. I also checked for "586 is the highest variant available", and updated all that were (officially or unofficially) unmaintained for which the update was easy (i.e., not comparable to making a whole new package from scratch due to upstream or version-specific changes). Active maintainers were contacted and have had several weeks to upgrade. Some are not upgraded because they are simply obsolete in various ways. dan -- Daniel Macks [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
