David,
   Did you try the packaging on fink tracking?

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1859491&group_id=17203&atid=414256
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2993939&group_id=17203&atid=414256
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2982947&group_id=17203&atid=414256

I may revise the packaging soon for llvm-2.8, however I have found it is much 
more profitable
to spend my time getting patches into FSF gcc than hanging around here begging 
for commits.
              Jack
ps I just enabled LTO as default for darwin today in gcc trunk. I also just 
finished revising
how darwin handles the stack boundaries so we can have stack realignments...

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg00237.html

My hope is that the more generic we become in FSF gcc, the less of a regression 
magnet
we are.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to