David, Did you try the packaging on fink tracking? https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1859491&group_id=17203&atid=414256 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2993939&group_id=17203&atid=414256 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2982947&group_id=17203&atid=414256
I may revise the packaging soon for llvm-2.8, however I have found it is much more profitable to spend my time getting patches into FSF gcc than hanging around here begging for commits. Jack ps I just enabled LTO as default for darwin today in gcc trunk. I also just finished revising how darwin handles the stack boundaries so we can have stack realignments... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg00237.html My hope is that the more generic we become in FSF gcc, the less of a regression magnet we are. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel