>> Following up on my end: I've reported the 0.10.2 test failure to >> ppl-devel, also observing that gmp vs gmp5 makes no difference in the >> test results. Since ppl development seems focused on 0.11+, I kind of >> doubt any fixes would come to 0.10. >> >> Jack, would it be acceptable for me to bump ppl to use gmp5 (as-is, in my >> experimental tree)? Along with it, older gcc4x's would need to inherit >> ppl's updated dependencies for coherence. AFAICS, gcc4x is the only >> anti-dep of ppl. > > The gcc 4.4.x releases and earlier can't be built against ppl9. As I > mentioned before, the only sane approach is to update gcc44 to 4.4.5 and > depreciate building graphite in gcc44 at the same time with > --without-ppl --without-cloog. This will free us to update gcc45 and > later to ppl9 and update legacy cloog to 0.15.10 which can be built > against ppl9. > Jack > ps I am holding off on gcc46 packages until Iain Sandoe finishes the gnu lto > containerization patch so that we can re-enable lto on darwin10. There are > also > a few other minor testsuite failures introduced by Xcode 4.0 that might get > fixed > as well.
Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear. Above, I was just asking about ppl:gmp5, nothing about ppl9. Fang David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
