Global $config is fine in this situation (UseFinkModules compartmentalizes the handling of some initialization, and it does export some Fink::Services functions into the main namespace).
Is --apt ode fixed for this new more-detailed output in standalone mode (when /sw/lib/perl5 (or in whatever @BASEPATH@ is defined) doesn't exist? I have fink in /sw, and the finkaptstatus data looks unchanged by this patch when I move aside my /sw/lib/perl5...still has the old format not the extra fields you are adding. dan On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:36:40 -0600, TheSin <the...@southofheaven.org> wrote: Okay now it works, standalone, --apt and --dpkg all tested, hopefully declaring $config as a global isn't bad ;) > > ------------------------- > > --- > TS > http://www.southofheaven.org/ > Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! > > On 2013-06-22, at 7:30 PM, TheSin <the...@southofheaven.org> wrote: > > > I take it back it only worked with out --apt :\ > > > Fetched 1072 kB in 4s (222 kB/s) > Can't locate > Fink/Config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /Library/Perl/5.12/darwin-th > > > I'll keep working on this :\ > > --- > > TS > > http://www.southofheaven.org/ > > Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! > > > On 2013-06-22, at 7:27 PM, TheSin <the...@southofheaven.org> wrote: > > >> okay now that I have inet back and hopefully stable, I fixed it > so that I get the right arch now. > >> >> Package: 64bit-cpu > >> Status: install ok installed > >> Priority: optional > >> Architecture: darwin-x86_64 > >> Version: 0-1 > >> Maintainer: Fink Devel <fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > >> Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of > the CPU] > >> The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we > >> are running is 64bit capable. >> . >> Web site: > http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage > >> . >> Maintainer: Fink Devel <fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > >> >> >> >> Here is the new patch, hopefully I did it right I > couldn't figure out what or why UseFinkModules() was for or did since > it returns and exports nothing. If this is wrong please let me know. > >> <fvp.patch> > >> >> --- > >> TS > >> http://www.southofheaven.org/ > >> Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! > >> >> On 2013-06-21, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Macks <dma...@netspace.org> wrote: > >> >>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:11:20 -0600, TheSin > <the...@southofheaven.org> wrote: > >>> The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to > get >>> it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I > spent lots of >>> time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why > girts weren't >>> working and it turns out the parser was considering > them invalid due to >>> missing fields like arch and priority. So I > made a quick patch which >>> is in my pull request and i'll attach it > here as well. I'd add it >>> myself but I'm not sure which branch > and if it'll affect anything else >>> that uses f-v-p > >>>> >>>> the current output looks like > >>>> >>>> Package: 64bit-cpu > >>>> Status: install ok installed > >>>> Version: 0-1 > >>>> description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability > of the CPU] > >>>> >>>> I'd like to change it to look like > >>>> >>>> Package: 64bit-cpu > >>>> Status: install ok installed > >>>> Priority: optional > >>>> Architecture: all > >>>> Version: 0-1 > >>>> Maintainer: Fink Devel <fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > >>>> Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability > of the CPU] > >>>> The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we > >>>> are running is 64bit capable. >>>> . >>>> Web site: > http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage > >>>> . >>>> Maintainer: Fink Devel <fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > >>> >>> This change to --apt output looks reasonable to me. I talked > to TheSin >>> in #fink yesterday, who confirmed that old apt would > also accept it, so >>> I don't see harm in sending this to master now > (rather than later as >>> part of the large apt upgrade work) (would > also benefit anyone who's >>> experimenting with new debian tools of > any sort). >>> >>> Technical question: Is this really > Architecture:all, given that it's >>> generated by a fink that is > single-arch? > >>> >>> dan > >>> >>> -- > >>> Daniel Macks > >>> dma...@netspace.org > >>> >>> >>> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > >>> >>> Build for Windows Store. > >>> >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Fink-devel mailing list > >>> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> List archive: > >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > >>> Subscription management: > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > >> > ------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
