Pretty much the same, yeah, but we get to say 'no longer supported' :-)

Sent from my iPod

> On Mar 28, 2014, at 18:23, TheSin <the...@southofheaven.org> wrote:
> 
> so really not much different then it is today?
> ---
> TS
> http://www.southofheaven.org/
> Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos!
> 
>> On Mar 28, 2014, at 6:48 PM, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> We've reached the point where it appears that most maintainers don't 
>> have access to 10.6, and we're getting divergences between the trees. 
>> I've also found some packages that won't build as 32-bit.
>> 
>> Also, most of our efforts probably need to be concentrated on fixing the 
>> Xcode 5.1 build failures on 10.8 and 10.9.
>> 
>> I propose ending official project support for 10.6 at the end of April. 
>> There are a couple of options:
>> 
>> 1)  Move all of the package descriptions into a 10.6-EOL structure.
>> 2)  Do nothing and just not update any of the base packages in the 10.4 
>> tree.
>> 
>> If somebody has an interest in keeping 10.6 going unofficially, they are 
>> certainly welcome to do that.
>> -- 
>> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
>> Fink User Liaison
>> My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fink-devel mailing list
>> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> List archive:
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
>> Subscription management:
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to