Pretty much the same, yeah, but we get to say 'no longer supported' :-) Sent from my iPod
> On Mar 28, 2014, at 18:23, TheSin <the...@southofheaven.org> wrote: > > so really not much different then it is today? > --- > TS > http://www.southofheaven.org/ > Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! > >> On Mar 28, 2014, at 6:48 PM, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> We've reached the point where it appears that most maintainers don't >> have access to 10.6, and we're getting divergences between the trees. >> I've also found some packages that won't build as 32-bit. >> >> Also, most of our efforts probably need to be concentrated on fixing the >> Xcode 5.1 build failures on 10.8 and 10.9. >> >> I propose ending official project support for 10.6 at the end of April. >> There are a couple of options: >> >> 1) Move all of the package descriptions into a 10.6-EOL structure. >> 2) Do nothing and just not update any of the base packages in the 10.4 >> tree. >> >> If somebody has an interest in keeping 10.6 going unofficially, they are >> certainly welcome to do that. >> -- >> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. >> Fink User Liaison >> My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Fink-devel mailing list >> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> List archive: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel >> Subscription management: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel