On 2014 Sep 29, at 1:38 PM, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It looks like you might have been reinventing the wheel: Silly me, i had thought that 'fink list rexx' && 'fink list regina' was sufficient due diligence. Should i assume that the reason the old package wasn't brought forward was lack of a maintainer and no complaints from users, or might there have been some other problems at the time? Q2: Since [to the best of my knowledge] nothing depends upon Regina, it doesn't seem to version its libraries. So this business in the old info file with "mv %i/lib/libregina.dylib %i/lib/libregina.0.dylib" is just to provide a dummy version? sent from Mountain Lion Mal: "Jayne, your mouth is talking. You might wanna look to that." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel