On 2014 Sep 29, at 1:38 PM, Alexander Hansen <[email protected]>
wrote:
> It looks like you might have been reinventing the wheel:
Silly me, i had thought that 'fink list rexx' && 'fink list regina' was
sufficient due diligence. Should i assume that the reason the old package
wasn't brought forward was lack of a maintainer and no complaints from users,
or might there have been some other problems at the time?
Q2: Since [to the best of my knowledge] nothing depends upon Regina, it doesn't
seem to version its libraries. So this business in the old info file with "mv
%i/lib/libregina.dylib %i/lib/libregina.0.dylib" is just to provide a dummy
version?
sent from Mountain Lion
Mal: "Jayne, your mouth is talking. You might wanna look to that."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
