> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Daniel Johnson <daniel.johnso...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.at.f...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Daniel, >> Is there any reason to maintain the box-0.2.2.info and box-0.3.4.info >> packaging in the 10.9-libc++ tree? I don't see any packages currently in the >> 10.9-libc++ tree with a BuildDepends on libboxcore0.2 or libboxcore0.3. >> Jack > > No, no reason other than they existed in the 10.7 tree when it was cloned and > I haven’t gotten to removing them yet. I’m working on pruning pythonmods now. > > Daniel >
Please do NOT remove my packages without asking first. I said I hadn’t gotten to them yet, I didn’t say you could remove them. I just tried to delete them and cvs got very confused because they were already gone. Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
