> On Oct 7, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth.at.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Johnson <daniel.johnso...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.at.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I noticed that Fedora is building both --with-abi-version=5 and > > --with-abi-version=6 in their ncurses 6.0 package... > > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ncurses.git/tree/ncurses.spec > > > > but that the installed headers will only be for the --with-abi-version=6 > > build. Thus the legacy --with-abi-version=5 shlibs are only there for > > back-ward compatibility and not new builds. > > > > Note I forgot to update the version in libncursesw5.info and ncurses.info to > match and have now done so. > > The ncurses5 packages build with --with-abi-version=5 to be backward > compatible while using the 6.0 source. The ncurses6 packages only use > --with-abi-version=6. We’re going to need both for some time until everything > can get updated. This way they can coexist. > > > I think you are still missing one step to fully mimic the Fedora packaging > approach. You need to convert your current ncurses.info into a > libncurses5.info which no longer contains the ncurses split-off and move that > one into libncurses6 instead (which could be refactored back into a > ncurses.info)
I didn’t do that because ncurses5 is Essential. I wasn’t sure what the interactions would be. That’s why I wanted others to weigh in. Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
