At 11:15 AM +1100 2/22/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 10:37 AM, Corey Van Allen wrote: > >>That is not the only installer that has problems with UFS file >>systems and pointing to a HFS plus partition does not solve it. I >>am debating on switching back over to HFS plus. >> >>Corey > > >I Originally switched from HFS+ to UFS as I thought there might be a >performance improvement (File operations that go via Installers, or >Finder seem to be dreadfully slow on my TiBook), but I have not had >any difference in performance that I can notice, just >incompatibilities with Classic and some (Broken?) Installers.
You're kidding, right? Everything i've read - including from Apple engineers - says UFS is _significantly_ slower and less compatible. -Ben -- http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
