On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 08:59 PM, Erik Price wrote:
>>> (soon enough the next version of Fink will be out and it'll be moot >>> anyway) >> >> Is this even correct? Since it afflicts and old version of the >> software (it's a problem in 0.3.1), how is a new upstream revision >> going to fix people's old and broken copies? > > Fine. Do you want to argue the parenthesized afterthoughts of my email, > or just add the article to the FAQ? This is exactly the point I was > trying to make -- that instead of picking nits or crying, why not just > make the necessary changes and be done with it? I was asking a question because I was unsure. I think I changed the wording to reflect this in the FAQ, but I wanted to double-check. I guess I'll just run off and commit what I have lying around in my CVS'd web dir and hope. -- Finlay _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
