On jeudi, mars 28, 2002, at 02:42 , Gaetano Vitale wrote:
> That may be:
> gvitale% which make
> /usr/local/bin/make
> gvitale% which install
> /usr/bin/install
>
> I don't have the same installation of the tools you have (mine are
> the Apple Dec2001), 'cose:
> gvitale% make --version
> make: no target to make.
> (that is --version is not an option)
> Should I try to reinstall the tools ('till yesterday they worked...)?
>
You certainly have /usr/bin/make, too, from the Apple dev tools.
Your /usr/local/bin/make is bsdmake, not gnumake, and it comes from
something non-fink and non-apple that you installed.
There is even a FAQ entry somewhere on the fink web site about
this. You *have* to make sure that "make" calls gnumake. There are
several ways to do this, for example by moving /usr/local/bin after
/usr/bin in your PATH environment variable (and making sure that
/usr/bin/make is really gnumake). Since there are sometimes
problems with weird libraries found in /usr/local/lib, too, the
safest way to avoid such problems is to move the whole directory
/usr/local/ out of the way while you compile fink packages.
Usually, there is nothing in /usr/local/ that you need for
compiling fink packages (except maybe if you want to test gcc-3.1,
but then you are supposed to know what you are doing).
--
Martin
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
