What I meant is that if Gaetano has a bad make package at the head of his PATH he may not be able to build the good one (s Catch-22).
-- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University Levitated Dipole Experiment MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 Phone: 617-252-1818 Fax: 208-988-4057 On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Jean-Fran�ois Mertens wrote: > > On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 04:13 , Alexander Hansen wrote: > > > One option is to install the fink make package, which gets put in > > /sw/bin > > and is at the head of the PATH if things are set up right, although I'm > > not sure it's available in binary form, and may not compile as is. > > > > Since feedback is requested on packages that can be moved to stable, > I can confrm that the make package builds perfectly, and that furthermore > I've been using it for hundreds of builds without the slightest sign of > trouble. > > Further, now that xfree86-* explicitly calls /usr/bin/make, I think > there are > no more any incompatibility reasons not to move "make" to stable.. > > J F Mertens > _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
