Bill Huey wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:03:51PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > > A mixup between libxml and libxml2, most likely. Do you have any libxml > > stuff installed in /usr/local? What gives (after having done a locate.updatedb) > > > > locate libxml/tree.h > > > > It should only show /sw/include/libxml2/libxml/tree.h. > > Actually, I'm having problems running locate.updatedb
What problems? Does "sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb" not work? > But an initial search revealed what looks like some libxml/ header > files. Actually, there is an "#include <libxml/tree.h>" statement that seems to be interpreted incorrectly in your config. It should find /sw/include/gnome-xml/libxml/tree.h which is the same as /sw/include/gnome-xml/tree.h and comes from the libxml package, but it should *not* find /sw/include/libxml2/libxml/tree.h which comes from the libxml2 package. In your case, it seems to find the latter (maybe at a different place like /usr/local/include/libxml, that's why I asked about /usr/local). > Should I continue to remove all packages dependent on libxml and > rebuild ? Not all of them. You *need* libxml. You don't need libxml2 for gconf, but probably for other packages. What I would try is to move /sw/include/libxml2 temporarily out of the way and see if this changes anything. And also, if you are not sure, move /usr/local out of the way. "sudo mv /usr/local /usr/local_away" does not destroy anything and can easily be reverted afterwards. -- Martin _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
