On 10.07.2002 12:17 Uhr, "Stefan Berreth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Because this is the rsync package. Nothing prevents you from making a >> "rsyncx" package, though, if it is a command line app. If it is a Mac >> OS X GUI app (Cocoa/Carbon), it shouldn't be package via Fink. > > hmm, the actual commandline tool is the 'original' rsync with added > support for HFS+ if both sides have a HFS+ supporting rsync version. So > it may well be the default version on OSX. I actually don't understand > why apple ships with the non-HFS+ suporting version. Maybe the tools' time hasn' come yet. Just tried to compile their source distribution and after a ./configure && make it produced tons of warnings and error messages resulting in a unsuccessful build on my 10.1. The binary installer is a bit too intrusive in my point of view. It installs 6 (!) versions of the binaries in various locations. Tim --- Tim Pritlove, Discordian Evangelist, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- If organized religion is the opium of the masses then disorganized religion is the marijuana of the lunatic fringe. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
