On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 09:31:41PM -0400, Ian L. wrote:
> On 8/31/02 8:59 PM, Thomas Harrington enlightened us with:
>
> > Those are the same errors that I had. For what it's worth, you get the
> > same errors if you grab the Unix source from www.vim.org and try to
> > build it yourself. So it's not specifically a fink problem, I think.
>
> You are correct, Tom. The different errors I received when I tried to
> compile Vim via Fink both with X and without Xwindows were the same when I
> downloaded the package and compiled it on my own.
>
> (If you've just tuned in, this was fixed by temporarily renaming
> /usr/local/include to something else.)
>
I can confirm this, it's the same for vim-nox. FWIW, it seems to be a
error related to ./configure or gcc 3.1 (is there a new autoconf in the
July DevTools?). I got loads of warnings about
"user-specified include dir -I/usr/local/include moved in priority since
it is already in system include path" or something to that end, with
every gcc call.
What happens is apparently that only /usr/local/include is in the compiler's
own include path, not /usr/include, and consequently some essential .h
files are missing in the course of the compile. It looks like
configure sets it up this way whenever there is a /usr/local/include
present, which seems rather braindead, of course. On second thought,
maybe this is a remnant from a developer-gcc3 setup to allow gcc3 to be
installed independently from gcc 2.95...
Any thoughts?
Derek
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
